Vendor comparison
Posted June 28th, 2007 by sean
To do: lets compare products fairly... this probably need to be combined into MAC-based and 802.1x based products, and concentrate only on the key competitors, and differentiate between open source and commercial?
OpenVMPS limitations
OpenVMPS works on a file basis, has no database, GUI, and is very intolant of errors on the configuration. FreeNAC is in fact an effort to make OpenVMPS enterprise-ready..
Problems With Cisco “VMPS” and “MAC Port” Authentication.
If you use the VMPS server on old catalysts already for limiting LAN access, what are the limitations?
- Lack of management features
- Monitoring
- Alerting
- Ease of use
- GUI
- User & device DB integration
- Lack of support from Cisco
Cisco NAC
TBD
Microsoft NAP
TBD
Juniper
TBD
What does FreeNAC *not* do?
- Layer 3 access control (for example offerning an automated web page with logon, but allowing layer 2 access with an IP address via DHCP..)
- VPN or firewall access control
- Remediation / quarantine vlans (planned)
- MAC authentication on non-cisco switches
- Printer-friendly version
- Login to post comments